<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Learn To Cook Watching The Cooking Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://familycookingtips.com/cooking-info/42-42/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://familycookingtips.com/cooking-info/42-42</link>
	<description>Cooking Tips for Family Sharing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Slapak</title>
		<link>http://familycookingtips.com/cooking-info/42-42/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald F. Slapak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familycookingtips.com/cooking-info/42-42#comment-11</guid>
		<description>My wife and I spend a considerable amount of time watching the various cooking channels &amp; I especcialy find it qute disturbing over the conctant and missuse of the term,&quot;guys&quot;.  It seems to make no distinction of what and or who the person speaking is. For example,at 2:30 on channel 21, chicken was being deep fried, corn on the cob,all of which was called &quot;guys&quot;. All this retoric being directed to &quot;you guys&quot; the veiwing audiance. Sounds like the audiance is comprised of cannablis. I remember Sesene Street exibiting more apprpreate and discreptive grammer. This missuse is not religated to just afore mentioned channel, but is each and every other channel. Sooooo, we will bite our toungues and continue to watch all those chicken parts, herbs,and other ingrededences hang out toghether. 

  Well, back to Webster and Sesame Street. Will see all you &quot;guys&quot; (regardless of your birth gender) happy cooking.

 We remain, the happily married (60 yrs.) Slapaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I spend a considerable amount of time watching the various cooking channels &amp; I especcialy find it qute disturbing over the conctant and missuse of the term,&#8221;guys&#8221;.  It seems to make no distinction of what and or who the person speaking is. For example,at 2:30 on channel 21, chicken was being deep fried, corn on the cob,all of which was called &#8220;guys&#8221;. All this retoric being directed to &#8220;you guys&#8221; the veiwing audiance. Sounds like the audiance is comprised of cannablis. I remember Sesene Street exibiting more apprpreate and discreptive grammer. This missuse is not religated to just afore mentioned channel, but is each and every other channel. Sooooo, we will bite our toungues and continue to watch all those chicken parts, herbs,and other ingrededences hang out toghether. </p>
<p>  Well, back to Webster and Sesame Street. Will see all you &#8220;guys&#8221; (regardless of your birth gender) happy cooking.</p>
<p> We remain, the happily married (60 yrs.) Slapaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

